Sibel Er · 11.10.2026
Author: Sibel Er
Affiliation: Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Amasya University
1. Introduction: The Geopolitical Convergence of AI and UK Strategy
In the contemporary global order, artificial intelligence (AI) transcends technical innovation to become a core determinant of geopolitical leverage, national security, and statecraft. For the United Kingdom, maintaining global leadership in AI governance and technological deployment is central to projecting international influence. This paper explores how the UK leverages AI as both an instrument of soft power and a critical security asset, examining its deep structural integration with the City of London—the global epicenter of financial technology, regulatory standard-setting, and capital allocation.
2. AI as a Mechanism of Soft Power and National Security
The UK’s strategic posture regarding AI relies on normative power, ethical leadership, and cybersecurity resilience. Rather than competing solely through raw computational scale (like the US or China), London positions itself as the global architect of safe, ethical, and trustworthy AI.
3. The City of London Nexus: Financial Infrastructure and Tech Governance
The City of London acts as the financial and structural anchor for the UK’s AI ambitions. The intersection between high-finance, algorithmic trading, and artificial intelligence creates a unique economic-security ecosystem.
4. Conclusion
The convergence of artificial intelligence, national security, and financial dominance defines the modern UK strategy in a multipolar world. By coupling normative soft power diplomacy with the robust financial engine of the City of London, the UK successfully navigates the complex intersection of technological innovation and geopolitical security.
References
Crootof, R. (2019). Artificial intelligence and national security: The framing of autonomous weapons. Harvard National Security Journal, 10(2), 195–245.
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2018). Cyber-security and cyber-terrorism: The politics and governance of risk. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(2), 295–311.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Krasner, S. D. (2020). Structural conflict: The Third World against global liberalism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 812–835.
Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft power: The evolution of a concept. Journal of Political Power, 14(1), 7–21.
Susskind, J. (2020). Future politics: Living together in a world transformed by tech. Oxford University Press.